Admin and finance
Read and post supplier invoices, match receipts to projects, chase overdue payments, file paperwork with portals and authorities.
We take the repetitive work off your team: invoices that file themselves, enquiries answered in minutes, reports that arrive on Monday without anyone asking for them.
✓ ROI calculated before we build · Can run entirely on your own servers
Automation isn't new. What's new is what an automation can understand.
Classic automation runs on fixed rules: "when an order arrives, send this email". Useful, but limited — it only handles structured, predictable information. The moment an invoice arrives in a different format or a customer phrases something unusually, the rule breaks and a person has to step in.
AI process automation removes that ceiling. With language models inside the flow, the process can read free text, interpret documents, classify intent, summarise and draft. It's the difference between a conveyor belt and an employee: the belt moves identical boxes, the employee opens the box and decides.
The third ingredient nobody mentions is human oversight. Good automation doesn't replace your judgement, it applies it at scale. Anything sensitive goes through an approval before it leaves the building.
These examples come from real projects, not from a brochure.
Read and post supplier invoices, match receipts to projects, chase overdue payments, file paperwork with portals and authorities.
Qualify enquiries and write them into the CRM, generate quotes from measurements or bills of materials, follow up without anyone having to remember.
Classify and route tickets, prepare draft replies, answer order and delivery status before anyone has to ask twice.
Generate, name, file and upload documents. Track expiry dates and renew them before they lapse.
Pull numbers from several systems and deliver a readable Monday report — not a spreadsheet nobody opens.
Reorder suggestions based on real consumption, supplier requests, and three-way matching of order, delivery note and invoice.
Before we build anything, we work out whether it's worth building.
The maths is deliberately simple so you can check it yourself: hours per week on the task, times your internal hourly cost, times 46 working weeks. That's the annual cost. Against it we put the cost of building and running the automation.
We're deliberately conservative: never a hundred per cent saving, because there are always exceptions a human has to handle. If a task doesn't pay for itself within a year, we don't recommend it — however interesting it would be to build.
So that "AI automation" doesn't stay abstract.
Take the most common case. A supplier invoice arrives as a PDF. Today someone opens the email, reads it, finds the matching purchase order, checks quantity and price, types the data into the accounting system and files the document. Four to seven minutes depending on the supplier. At two hundred invoices a month, that's around eighteen hours.
Automated, the same job runs like this: the workflow watches the mailbox and spots an attached invoice. A language model reads the PDF and pulls out supplier, invoice number, date, line items, net, tax and total — regardless of where on the page those numbers sit, which is precisely what breaks traditional OCR templates.
Then the matching: is there a purchase order with that number? Do quantity and price agree? If they do, it posts and files. If they don't — and this is the important part — nothing happens automatically. The invoice lands in a review queue with a note saying what doesn't add up, and a person decides.
In practice about four out of five invoices go through untouched. The fifth is exactly the case that needs experience — and that's what you pay your people for.
Four patterns we see over and over, usually when we inherit a failed project.
Automating a process that's wrong. When a flow has grown around a constraint that stopped existing years ago, automating it sets the detour in concrete. So we ask why each step exists. Sometimes the best automation is deleting the step.
Starting with the most spectacular case. The hardest process is tempting because it hurts most. It's also the one where most can go wrong, and a first project that fails costs you the second. We start with something that's live in two weeks.
Nobody owns it. Automations need an owner inside the business — not technical, operational: someone who notices when the output is wrong. Without that person the flow keeps running blind.
The exceptions stay hidden. Every process has edge cases, and you usually hear about them after the workflow is built. So we ask early and uncomfortably specifically: "what was the last time this didn't go to plan?"
No. We automate on top of what you already have. Replacing a system is its own project and shouldn't happen as a side effect of automation.
Then we'll tell you straight. Some systems can be reached through the database, a file drop or browser automation; others have no reasonable route. We establish that before quoting, not after.
In the projects we've delivered, nobody has. What disappears is hours spent copying, renaming and uploading. What stays is the work that needs judgement.
Wherever you want. n8n can run entirely on your own servers. For the AI models we tell you exactly which provider sees which data before we build.
Spend thirty minutes telling us what your week looks like. We'll tell you which task we'd tackle first and what it costs you today.
Book a free call